Well, the comments on the last climate change comic escalated quickly – especially after I “offensively” made a reference to climate change deniers. I told you it wasn’t too late to ruin your family Thanksgiving! Regardless, ‘Denier’ is the appropriate term for someone who refuses to acknowledge contradictory evidence, and it irritates me when the media refers to them as “skeptics”.
Rhetorical arguments against scientific findings are pointless without actual scientific evidence to support your assertions. If you found that unreferenced “fact” on a blog, you’re going to have to do better.
Also if you enjoy the comic please show your support by voting on Top Web Comics! They reset votes on the 1st, and you can help us jump into the Top 100 – FOR SCIENCE!
Right now we are ranked:
As a journalist, aren't you supposed to cover both sides?
The media's false dichotomy is part of the problem!
Maybe a fair system would be to allot media coverage in proportion to actual scientific evidence.
But here's a blog article that says-